This from the LA Times?

AFTER WEEKS OF internal strife, House Democrats have brought forth their proposal for forcing President Bush to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq by 2008. The plan is an unruly mess: bad public policy, bad precedent and bad politics. If the legislation passes, Bush says he’ll veto it, as well he should.

It was one thing for the House to pass a nonbinding vote of disapproval. It’s quite another for it to set out a detailed timetable with specific benchmarks and conditions for the continuation of the conflict. Imagine if Dwight Eisenhower had been forced to adhere to a congressional war plan in scheduling the Normandy landings or if, in 1863, President Lincoln had been forced by Congress to conclude the Civil War the following year. This is the worst kind of congressional meddling in military strategy.

This is not to say that Congress has no constitutional leverage — only that it should exercise it responsibly. In a sense, both Bush and the more ardent opponents of the war are right. If a majority in Congress truly believes that the war is not in the national interest, then lawmakers should have the courage of their convictions and vote to stop funding U.S. involvement. They could cut the final checks in six months or so to give Bush time to manage the withdrawal. Or lawmakers could, as some Senate Democrats are proposing, revoke the authority that Congress gave Bush in 2002 to use force against Iraq.

But if Congress accepts Bush’s argument that there is still hope, however faint, that the U.S. military can be effective in quelling the sectarian violence, that U.S. economic aid can yet bring about an improvement in Iraqi lives that won’t be bombed away and that American diplomatic power can be harnessed to pressure Shiites and Sunnis to make peace — if Congress accepts this, then lawmakers have a duty to let the president try this “surge and leverage” strategy.

By interfering with the discretion of the commander in chief and military leaders in order to fulfill domestic political needs, Congress undermines whatever prospects remain of a successful outcome. It’s absurd for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) to try to micromanage the conflict, and the evolution of Iraqi society, with arbitrary timetables and benchmarks.

I wouldn’t trust Speaker Botox to be a traffic cop, much less a General. She’s not fit to clean the toilets for the troops (she has illegals do it for her), much less attempt to tell them what to do.

It is absolutely unreasonable to think that Congress can, or should micro-manage the war.

Also Posting:

Related Posts:

Technorati tags: , , ,

Sphere: Related Content


Filed Under: 110th Congress, 2008 Elections, Dhimmicrats, Foward In Iraq, News of the Day, Pelosi's Lemmings, Speaker Pelosi

Trackback URL


Comments

Comments are closed.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

If your comment/trackback doesn't show up, please refer to the Comment & Trackback Policy Page.

  • NaNoWriMo Nov 1st - 30th

  • Baghdad Time

  • Tip Jar

  • Change Out Of Your Pocket

  • Feedburner

    SeeJaneMom

    Vigilant Freedom/910 Group Bloggers

    PA Pundits

  • Who's Online?

  • On Deck...

  • Technorati Rank & TTLB

  • Renounce Terrorism!

  • 101st Fighting Keyboardist

  • Hillbilly Ecosystem

  • Blogs Against The New York Times

  • Blue Star

  • Anti-PC League

  • Guard The Borders

  • Reject the UN

  • Technorati Favorites

  • Spam Blocked

Bad Behavior has blocked 5446 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.

This site is created and edited using Dreamweaver 8.
Posts are created using Windows Live Writer.
We suggest viewing this site using Firefox at 1280 x 1024.